A million thanks to Sherry Pitcock for her expert design!!!
http://www.natalieneith.com
Wednesday, 11 July 2012
Monday, 9 July 2012
Two U.S. agencies try to get lenders to ease tough mortgage rules
The Federal Housing Finance Agency and the Federal Housing Administration say many lenders' underwriting restrictions go beyond what the agencies themselves require.
By Kenneth R. Harney
July 8, 2012
WASHINGTON — Two federal agencies with far-reaching influence over
the mortgage market are working on a problem that could affect the
ability of many consumers to obtain a home loan: How to encourage
private lenders to ease up on their underwriting restrictions that go
beyond what the agencies themselves require for mortgage approvals.
Both the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees giant investors Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and the Federal Housing Administration,
which runs the low-down-payment FHA program, are considering steps they
might take to persuade lenders to open the mortgage spigots a little
wider.
Together, Fannie, Freddie and the FHA account for 90%-plus
of all home loan funding. The focus of their little-publicized reform
projects: the "overlay" rules many lenders have adopted that call for
extra fees, larger down payments and higher credit scores than Fannie,
Freddie or the FHA require.
For
example, Fannie and Freddie may accept FICO credit scores of 660 to
680, and the FHA will approve applications with scores as low as 580.
Yet lenders originating loans for them often want to see scores 100
points higher.
Another example: The FHA recently inaugurated a
"streamline refi" program designed to encourage widespread refinancings
for borrowers with good payment histories by offering low mortgage
insurance fees, no appraisals and no credit checks.
Great idea,
but lenders have clamped their own more stringent underwriting
restrictions on the program, frustrating consumers. Some banks require
full appraisals, credit checks and add-on fees. Other lenders have
announced that they are limiting eligibility for the program to
customers they already service, despite the fact that the FHA allows
borrowers to seek streamline refinancings from any FHA-approved lender.
Why
are lenders making it tougher than necessary for creditworthy
applicants to obtain a mortgage? Tops on the list: They are practicing
what one prominent mortgage industry consultant describes as "defensive
lending."
"Defensive lending is the mortgage equivalent of
defensive medicine," where doctors run more tests than needed to reduce
litigation risk, said Brian Chapelle, principal at Potomac Partners in
Washington, D.C. "Rather than more medical tests, mortgage lenders are
adding underwriting requirements and program restrictions to avoid
overstepping a sometimes ambiguous line" that will trigger penalties
from Fannie, Freddie or the FHA.
Even minor technical infractions
in underwriting or documentation can cause "buyback" demands by Fannie
or Freddie when loans go into default, with costs per loan for the
lender sometimes soaring to hundreds of thousands of dollars. Plus the
Justice Department is putting pressure on major banks to pay millions of
dollars to settle allegations of systemic flaws in their mortgage
practices — settlements the banks consent to not on the merits but to
avoid protracted litigation and hits to their stock prices.
On top
of this, banks and other originators are uncertain about upcoming
mortgage regulations that stem from the Dodd-Frank financial reform law
that will spell out the rules for future lending.
In a nutshell,
Chapelle says, government agencies and Congress have fostered a
play-it-ultra-safe environment, where the pressure is intense to lend
only on the most conservative terms, even if that means turning down
creditworthy applicants.
What to do? The two agencies are mum about specifics but are expected to announce reforms sometime in the coming weeks.
Lenders,
on the other hand, know precisely what they'd like to see. Steve
O'Connor, senior vice president of the Mortgage Bankers Assn., says
lenders want several key changes in current procedures, including clear,
point-by-point guidance on how the agencies will define reasonable
grounds for buybacks or indemnification going forward.
Lenders
also need assurance that after an agreed-upon period of time — say, 24
to 36 months — they will not be blamed for deficient underwriting on a
loan that goes belly up. Some mortgage companies have been confronted
with buyback demands on loans that defaulted for economic reasons after
seven or eight years of on-time payments. "That's crazy," O'Connor said.
FHA
lenders also want greater fairness in the way they're treated when
loans default, Chapelle said, including revisions of lender monitoring
standards that evaluate them poorly when they try to accommodate
borrowers with lower credit scores and other blemishes.
Bottom
line: Lenders say they could loosen up a little on underwriting when
federal agencies ease their buyback demands. Since the two top agencies
are trying to figure how to do this, home buyers might see slightly less
punitive "overlay" fees and underwriting later in the year. Don't hold
your breath, but it could happen and it just might help you get approved
for a mortgage.
Distributed by Washington Post Writers Group.
Copyright © 2012, Los Angeles Times
By Kenneth R. Harney
July 8, 2012
WASHINGTON — Two federal agencies with far-reaching influence over
the mortgage market are working on a problem that could affect the
ability of many consumers to obtain a home loan: How to encourage
private lenders to ease up on their underwriting restrictions that go
beyond what the agencies themselves require for mortgage approvals.
Both the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees giant investors Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and the Federal Housing Administration,
which runs the low-down-payment FHA program, are considering steps they
might take to persuade lenders to open the mortgage spigots a little
wider.
Together, Fannie, Freddie and the FHA account for 90%-plus
of all home loan funding. The focus of their little-publicized reform
projects: the "overlay" rules many lenders have adopted that call for
extra fees, larger down payments and higher credit scores than Fannie,
Freddie or the FHA require.
For
example, Fannie and Freddie may accept FICO credit scores of 660 to
680, and the FHA will approve applications with scores as low as 580.
Yet lenders originating loans for them often want to see scores 100
points higher.
Another example: The FHA recently inaugurated a
"streamline refi" program designed to encourage widespread refinancings
for borrowers with good payment histories by offering low mortgage
insurance fees, no appraisals and no credit checks.
Great idea,
but lenders have clamped their own more stringent underwriting
restrictions on the program, frustrating consumers. Some banks require
full appraisals, credit checks and add-on fees. Other lenders have
announced that they are limiting eligibility for the program to
customers they already service, despite the fact that the FHA allows
borrowers to seek streamline refinancings from any FHA-approved lender.
Why
are lenders making it tougher than necessary for creditworthy
applicants to obtain a mortgage? Tops on the list: They are practicing
what one prominent mortgage industry consultant describes as "defensive
lending."
"Defensive lending is the mortgage equivalent of
defensive medicine," where doctors run more tests than needed to reduce
litigation risk, said Brian Chapelle, principal at Potomac Partners in
Washington, D.C. "Rather than more medical tests, mortgage lenders are
adding underwriting requirements and program restrictions to avoid
overstepping a sometimes ambiguous line" that will trigger penalties
from Fannie, Freddie or the FHA.
Even minor technical infractions
in underwriting or documentation can cause "buyback" demands by Fannie
or Freddie when loans go into default, with costs per loan for the
lender sometimes soaring to hundreds of thousands of dollars. Plus the
Justice Department is putting pressure on major banks to pay millions of
dollars to settle allegations of systemic flaws in their mortgage
practices — settlements the banks consent to not on the merits but to
avoid protracted litigation and hits to their stock prices.
On top
of this, banks and other originators are uncertain about upcoming
mortgage regulations that stem from the Dodd-Frank financial reform law
that will spell out the rules for future lending.
In a nutshell,
Chapelle says, government agencies and Congress have fostered a
play-it-ultra-safe environment, where the pressure is intense to lend
only on the most conservative terms, even if that means turning down
creditworthy applicants.
What to do? The two agencies are mum about specifics but are expected to announce reforms sometime in the coming weeks.
Lenders,
on the other hand, know precisely what they'd like to see. Steve
O'Connor, senior vice president of the Mortgage Bankers Assn., says
lenders want several key changes in current procedures, including clear,
point-by-point guidance on how the agencies will define reasonable
grounds for buybacks or indemnification going forward.
Lenders
also need assurance that after an agreed-upon period of time — say, 24
to 36 months — they will not be blamed for deficient underwriting on a
loan that goes belly up. Some mortgage companies have been confronted
with buyback demands on loans that defaulted for economic reasons after
seven or eight years of on-time payments. "That's crazy," O'Connor said.
FHA
lenders also want greater fairness in the way they're treated when
loans default, Chapelle said, including revisions of lender monitoring
standards that evaluate them poorly when they try to accommodate
borrowers with lower credit scores and other blemishes.
Bottom
line: Lenders say they could loosen up a little on underwriting when
federal agencies ease their buyback demands. Since the two top agencies
are trying to figure how to do this, home buyers might see slightly less
punitive "overlay" fees and underwriting later in the year. Don't hold
your breath, but it could happen and it just might help you get approved
for a mortgage.
Distributed by Washington Post Writers Group.
Copyright © 2012, Los Angeles Times
Monday, 2 July 2012
After Years of False Hopes, Signs of a Turn in Housing
By BINYAMIN APPELBAUM
Published: June 27, 2012
WASHINGTON — Announcements of a housing recovery have become a wrongheaded rite of summer, but after several years of false hopes, evidence is accumulating that the optimists may finally be right.
Published: June 27, 2012
WASHINGTON — Announcements of a housing recovery have become a wrongheaded rite of summer, but after several years of false hopes, evidence is accumulating that the optimists may finally be right.
The housing market is starting to recover. Prices are rising. Sales are
increasing. Home builders are clearing lots and raising frames.
Joe Niece, a real estate agent in the Minneapolis suburb of Eden
Prairie, said he recently concluded a streak of 13 consecutive bidding
wars over homes that his clients wanted to buy. Each sold above the
asking price.
“I just had a home that wasn’t supposed to go on the market for two
weeks sold before it even went on the market,” Mr. Niece said. “It’s
definitely a lot different than what we saw” during the last few
summers.
Like the economic recovery that began three years ago, what happens next
is likely to prove a little disappointing. The pace of recovery will
probably be slow, and the prices of many homes will continue to decline.
Millions of people remain underwater, owing more on their homes than the
homes are worth, and unable to sell. Millions of families still face foreclosure. And a setback in the still-fragile economic recovery could easily reverse the uptick in housing prices, too.
But roughly six years after the housing market began its longest and deepest slide since the Great Depression, a growing number of experts and people who actually put money into housing believe the end has come.
“Our sense is that the market is recovering, and we’re extremely
confident that it’s not going to get worse,” said Ronnie Morgan, a San
Diego real estate professional who recently created a $10 million
partnership to buy foreclosed homes. The group, Alegria Real Estate
Funds, already has bought about 20 homes in suburban communities, most
of which they plan to hold as rental properties.
“It feels very much like we’ve hit a bottom and we’re starting to come
off of that bottom,” said Stuart Miller, chief executive of Lennar, a
major national home builder based in Miami. The company said Wednesday
that second-quarter profits were higher than expected, and orders for new homes rose 40 percent.
“I’m a little nervous,” Mr. Miller quickly added in a conference call
with analysts, “about saying the word ‘recovery.’ ”
The trend is clear in the data. The widely respected S.&P./Case-Shiller index reported earlier this week
that sales prices for existing homes rose in April for the first time
this year. Several other measures, including a seasonally adjusted
version of the index, show that price increases began in February. The
pace of housing construction has increased. And the National Association of Realtors said Wednesday
that pending home sales climbed to the highest level since the end of a
federal tax credit for first-time buyers in September 2010.
This is the fourth consecutive year that the housing market has shown
signs of revival, and each previous episode ended with prices renewing
their downward slide.
But with each passing year, an eventual recovery has grown more likely.
Prices have continued to fall, and the economy has continued to recover,
a combination that has expanded the pool of potential buyers. The
population has continued to grow while few new homes have been built.
Basic indicators of market health that bulged during the bubble, like
the ratio of housing prices to income, have returned to more normal
levels.
Government efforts to help homeowners have intensified, allowing more borrowers to refinance or avoid foreclosure.
“All bets are off if anything happens to the economy, but apart from
that, I think the fundamentals look better than they’ve looked in 17 or
18 years,” said Richard K. Green, a professor of real estate at the
University of Southern California.
Professor Green cited the combination of rising rents and low mortgage
rates as a powerful inducement to potential buyers, both renters who
would prefer to own and investors who want to become landlords.
“Compared to a lot of other investments right now this looks pretty good,” he said.
The influx of investors is a major reason that the market is looking
stronger. Mr. Morgan, 56, built apartments before the housing crash. In
2010, seeing a new opportunity, he and some friends started bidding at
the foreclosure auctions then held on the steps of the San Diego County
Courthouse.
At first they bought properties to renovate and resell. Now they are
focused on potential rental properties in the kinds of gated, planned
communities in suburban San Diego that once were populated almost
exclusively by people who owned their homes. Some of their tenants are
former homeowners.
And competition has increased. The auctions were moved from the
courthouse steps last year because the crowds had grown too large.
“There’s not a whole lot of other places to put your money,” Mr. Morgan said.
There are still reasons for caution. An unusually warm winter seems to
have given a temporary and misleading boost to a range of economic
indicators.
The pace of economic growth remains slow and fragile, shadowed by the
risk that politicians in Europe and Washington will fail to address
looming problems.
And the rise in prices is happening despite the vast number of vacant
houses awaiting buyers, up to two million more than the normal level,
with several million more houses still at risk of being foreclosed.
But this “shadow inventory” is not distributed uniformly, according to a
new analysis by Goldman Sachs. Even within metropolitan areas like
Phoenix, the vacant houses are clustered in less desirable
neighborhoods, while buyers are seeking homes in areas where there are
few vacancies.
Under these circumstances, the researchers concluded, “It is possible
for us to see both house price increases and excess housing supply at
the same time.”
Indeed, in a growing number of areas demand for homes is outstripping supply.
The number of homes for sale has been falling for more than a year, according to the National Association of Realtors. Some owners are waiting for prices to rise; some of them must wait because they are underwater.
Mr. Niece, the Minnesota real estate agent, said he and his partner had
seen their book of listings decline from about 120 properties to 70
properties, about 45 of which already are under contract.
“I have buyers every single day complaining that they can’t find houses,” he said.
Driving through a neighboring suburb last week, Mr. Niece said that he
passed a sign outside another real estate office that read, “The market
is great. We’ve sold all of our inventory. We need listings.”
A version of this article appeared in print on June 28, 2012, on page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: Housing Market Sending Signals It Is Recovering.
Wednesday, 20 June 2012
Good News for the Housing Market
By Karen Weise on June 14, 2012
The
housing market’s been giving mixed signals, flashes of hope mixed with
sudden bad news. There’s no sign yet that a real recovery has taken
hold, but some new data are optimistic.
Shadow inventory is shrinking quickly. The so-called shadow inventory refers to distressed properties that aren’t listed for sale but probably will be—homes on which borrowers are grossly delinquent or already in foreclosure, or that banks have already repossessed. CoreLogic says in April, 1.5 million homes were in the shadows, which equates to a four-month supply, down from a six-month supply a year earlier. A smaller shadow inventory can be positive for prices because it means there are fewer distressed homes poised to come on the market.
Foreclosures are up. In the fall of 2010, the robo-signing scandal erupted over how banks were using faulty paperwork to evict borrowers. They cut back on processing foreclosures, building up a backlog of distressed properties. In March, banks agreed to a $25 billion robo-signing settlement, and new data show banks are restarting the foreclosure machinery. In May, banks filed to foreclose on 205,990 properties—a 9 percent increase during April, according to RealtyTrac. The foreclosure pickup hurts the people who are losing their homes but helps the housing market in the long run because it lets banks get through the backlog and eventually move on.
Borrowers are building more equity in their homes. Our colleagues at Bloomberg News report that homeowners have made the biggest jump in home equity in more than 60 years. Half of borrowers who are refinancing are paying down some of their debt and reducing their loans. They’re also refinancing into shorter-term loans that have higher monthly payments but let them pay down principal quicker. Overall, mortgage debt is down 7 percent since 2007—a small consolation for the decline in home values, which are down 23 percent over the same period.
Finally, if you’re looking for more data and a big-picture view, check out Harvard’s annual State of the Nation’s Housing report that’s out today. It also sees signs of recovery in the market and says unless something comes along to dent the broad economy, the housing picture should become even brighter.
Weise is a reporter for Bloomberg Businessweek.
Wednesday, 6 June 2012
Asking Prices Flat in May While Rent Increases: Trulia 06/05/2012 BY: ESTHER CHO
Asking Prices Flat in May While Rent Increases: Trulia
06/05/2012BY: ESTHER CHO 
Asking prices fell flat in May after three consecutive monthly increases while also decreasing from the year before, according to reports from Trulia.
Asking prices on homes for sale were unchanged in May on a seasonally adjusted basis and fell by 0.2 percent year-over-year. However, when excluding foreclosures, asking prices actually rose 1 percent on a yearly basis, while foreclosure prices dropped 5.8 percent over the same time period.
According to Trulia, asking prices lead sales prices by approximately two or more months.
“Asking prices and employment both stagnated in May, yet one more reminder that the housing recovery depends on job growth,” said Jed Kolko, Trulia’s chief economist.
Due to the gains in April and March, asking prices rose 1.6 percent on a quarterly basis.
Out of the 100 largest metros, 41 saw yearly price gains, and more than double, 86, had quarterly price increases.
“Metros where prices rose the most have stronger demand from faster job growth and tighter supply from fewer foreclosed homes on the market,” said
Kolko.
Kolko.
Trulia named Seattle as a turnaround metro since prices rose 4.4 percent quarter-over-quarter (February to May) after seeing a dramatic 12.5 percent yearly drop (February 2011-2012). Cleveland, Las Vegas, Milwaukee, Tacoma, and Toledo were also counted as top turnaround metros for their quarterly increases after their yearly falls.
While asking prices did not show upward movement in May, rent was up 1.6 percent on a quarterly basis and up 6 percent from a year ago. In April, the year-over-year increase in rent was 5.4 percent and 4.8 percent in March.
Out of the 25 largest rental markets in the U.S., only Las Vegas saw a yearly decline in rent.
Ten Places with Greatest Yearly Rental Increases
- San Francisco (14.4 percent)
- Oakland, California (11.4 percent)
- Miami, Florida (11.3 percent)
- Denver, Colorado (10.5 percent)
- Boston, Massachusetts (9.8 percent)
- Seattle, Washington (9.6 percent)
- Houston, Texas (9.2 percent)
- Portland, Oregon (6.8 percent)
- Chicago, Illinois (6.4 percent)
- New York (5.9 percent)
Monday, 4 June 2012
Real estate as retirement income
By Jill Schlesinger
(iStockphoto)
Let's start with the numbers. After experiencing a massive bubble from 2000-2006 (no, it's not normal for prices to double over the course of seven years), real estate cratered. Prices dropped almost 35 percent from peak levels, and in some areas, like Florida and Las Vegas, the damage was far worse.
Now, a full six years from the peak, recent housing data indicates that a bottoming process is occurring across the country. Existing home sales in April rose 3.4 percent from the previous month to the highest level in almost two years and 10 percent above year-ago levels. Adding to the case that the market is bottoming, inventory is down 20.6 percent from a year ago. In Econ 101, reduced inventory means less downward pressure on prices.
Similar results were seen in new home sales, which rose 3.3 percent from the previous month, almost 10 percent from year-ago levels and 25 percent from the lows. Still, there's still a long way to go before we see a "normal" housing market. The total level of sales is historically weak and 2012 will probably be the third worst year on record after 2011 and 2010. However, historically low mortgage rates are helping the market by making the cost of ownership more affordable, assuming that the buyer can qualify.
Sensing this opportunity, many are wondering whether a jump into the rental market can boost retirement savings and income. The answer is yes, with a few important caveats. Buyers must have realistic expectations, starting with a long-term time horizon and recognition that the days of "flipping" a house to score a big profit are gone. In fact, in the early going, many properties may just break even. The goal is for the owner to be mortgage-free and to collect a steady stream of income.
Additionally, securing a mortgage for rental property has changed dramatically since the bubble years. "No money down" loans are nonexistent; today, lenders generally require a deposit of 30 percent. Even with that chunk of equity, mortgage rates for rental properties are higher than for owner-occupied residences.
One way to defray some of the cost of owning income-producing properties is to use their favorable tax treatment. The Internal Revenue Service allows you to claim depreciation on your property over 27.5 years, which is a way to spread the cost of an asset over a period of time. Here's how it works: You can offset a portion of your rental income by the cost basis of your rental property (what you paid for the property plus improvements, but not the land) divided by 27.5. While this is just one way to defray taxable income, note that depreciation is a way to defer taxation, not escape it.
The IRS imposes taxes on depreciation when you sell the property, which is known as "recapture." You can defer recapture by using proceeds from the property to purchase a new one via a 1031 exchange but you must follow strict rules to comply. Additionally, if you own the property until death, your heirs will not be subject to recapture.
If the ability to create a steady stream of income with favorable tax treatment seems too good to be true, it is. Being a landlord requires hard work. No amount of screening will prevent you from encountering a horrible renter or a midnight call about some problem. If you don't want to be involved at that level, you'll have to hire a management company, which will obviously eat into your cash flow.
Finally, remember that real estate is an illiquid asset. Be sure to have access to sufficient liquid assets before you become a landlord.
Distributed by Tribune Media Services, Inc.
Tuesday, 22 May 2012
from DS News:
Breaking News: Prices Show Strongest Year-to-Year Gain in 6 Years
The median price of an existing home climbed 10 percent to $177,400 from $161,100 in April 2011, the strongest year-to-year gain since January 2006. Existing-home sales rose to 4.62 million (seasonally adjusted annualized rate) in April from a downwardly revised March rate of 4.47 million, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) reported Tuesday morning. Economists had forecast the April sales pace would be 4.66 million.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)